Attachment Styles

Source: Courtesy of Pexels

Attachment Styles

John Bowlby, renowned psychologist, focused a great deal on attachment behaviors. He noted, that an “attachment behaviour is any form of behaviour that results in a person attaining or maintaining proximity to some other clearly identified individual who is conceived as better able to cope with the world” (Bowlby, 1988, p. 27). Attachment behaviors are observed throughout the lifecycle, however they are most obvious during early childhood and in response to threat. Mary Ainsworth, famous attachment researcher, examined children through her use of the strange-situation paradigm, which focused on their reactions in the presence of a stranger and absence and reunification with their mothers. Ainsworth identified three main attachment types: secure attachment, insecure-resistant attachment, and insecure-avoidant attachment (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978).

Research has shown that childhood attachment styles are consistent with those found in adulthood. The attachment individuals develop during childhood, as a result of their interactions with their caregivers, will be similar to the attachment styles exhibited in their adult romantic relationships (Hazan & Shaver, 1987). Attachment styles can affect our partner selection, the way in which we relate to our significant others, and the behaviors we display during the course of our relationship. As a result, when examining relationship related behaviors, attachment styles should be considered

Relationship Related Outcomes of Attachment Style

Many contemporary researchers assess attachment using two continuous orthogonal dimensions: avoidance and anxiety. The dimensions of anxiety and avoidance capture a great deal of the variability in adult attachment styles (Brennan et al., 1998, as cited in Etcheverry, Le, Wu, & Wei, 2013).  Furthermore, levels of attachment and anxiety can influence peoples’ evaluations of their romantic partners and relationships (Rusbult et al., 2001, as cited in Etcheverry et al., 2013).

The anxiety dimension relates to how often a person feels as if he/she is going to be rejected by his/her partner. As a result, people who have a great deal of anxiety tend to maintain close proximity to their partners due to fear of abandonment. Those who are high on the anxiety scale are hyper-focused on attachment and “…intensely desire closeness and intimacy in their relationships” (Etcheverry et al., 2013, p. 547). Individuals with attachment-related anxiety experience stress over possible abandonment and have little trust in their attachment figures. They feel insecure when not in close proximity to their partners and often ruminate about their relationships (Rholes, Paetzold, & Friedman, 2008). They spend a great deal of time focusing on what is or what can go wrong.

Levels of avoidance relate to how comfortable a person feels with emotional intimacy (Butzer & Campbell, 2008). Research has shown that “…people who score higher on avoidance tend to be less invested in their relationships and strive to remain psychologically and emotionally independent of their partners (Hazan & Shaver, 1994, as cited in Butzer & Campbell, 2008, p. 141). Etcheverry et al. (2013) note that high avoidance is associated with “…less valuing of close relationships, and less reliance on relationships to fulfill attachment needs” (p. 547).  Those who are high in attachment-related avoidance distance themselves from their partners as they assume that these figures will not be responsive when needed. Essentially, they avoid getting too close for fear of losing their partners.

Butzer and Campbell (2008) conducted a study with 116 Canadian married couples. They measured the couples’ levels of attachment, marital, and sexual satisfaction. Results demonstrated that individuals with high levels of anxiety and avoidance were less sexually satisfied in their marriages. Furthermore, those who had avoidant partners were also less sexually satisfied (Butzer & Campbell, 2008).

Individuals who score low on both the anxiety and avoidance dimension are securely attached. Securely attached individuals tend to be the most well-adjusted and comfortable in their relationships. Having a secure attachment to one’s partner also plays a large part in overall relationship satisfaction (Rholes, Paetzold, & Friedman, 2008).

http://ift.tt/2ynB8IW

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s